Ohio Set to Vote
on Union Rights
Published: March 1, 2011 - New York Times
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Republican State Senators on Tuesday unveiled a new version
of a bill governing public employee unions, saying the legislation would
preserve the right of workers to bargain collectively, but Democratic lawmakers
said it did not appear to include enough modifications to win their support.
One proposal that Republicans appear to have left in the legislation, and
which is hotly contested by Democrats and union members, would bar public unions
from striking.
gIf you take away the right to strike, you are taking the biggest bargaining
chip off the table,h said Senator Joe Schiavoni, a Democrat.
Shortly after the bill was introduced Tuesday afternoon, Democratic lawyers
and lawmakers began poring over its contents. The legislation could come to a
vote in the State Senate as early as Wednesday.
While the restoration of bargaining rights in the 99-page bill represented a
concession by Republicans, it was not immediately clear to what extent unions
would be able to exercise those rights.
gThe biggest difference is wefre allowing state employees to collectively
bargain,h said Senator Kevin
Bacon, a Republican. gItfs going to be fairly limited from where it is now,
but they are still going to be able to collectively bargain.h
A similar measure is pending in Indiana. Democratic lawmakers there and in
Wisconsin have temporarily left their states to avoid having to vote on the
legislation.
Republicans in all three states say the legislation, which seeks to eliminate
long-held union prerogatives, is part of broader austerity measures intended to
reduce crippling budget deficits and rein in runaway public employee pensions.
Mark Horton, a retired firefighter who is treasurer of the Ohio Association
of Professional Firefighters, said rhetoric suggesting that union members were
overpaid and pampered was unfair.
gThe upper class has done a great job of pitting the middle class against
itself,h he said. gI get a pension of $3,700 a month. If someone thinks Ifm
riding high on the hog, thatfs just not the case.h
Last week, the president of the Senate, Tom Niehaus, said the changes would
include the right to bargain over wages, but would prohibit strikes by all
public workers. Union leaders have said they oppose the bill in any form,
calling it a political blow directed at public employees, whose unions have
traditionally supported Democrats.
In Wisconsin, the political divide was expected to only widen Tuesday as Gov.
Scott
Walker prepared to announce his budget proposal, which is expected to cut $1
billion in aid to local government over two years.
By early Tuesday, critics of Mr. Walker had already assembled outside the
Capitol in Madison, as they have for two weeks. Security was tight, and only
some people were allowed to enter as part of an effort by the Walker
administration to allow only small numbers of protesters inside the building
during the governorfs budget address, scheduled for 4 p.m.
But Tuesday afternoon, a state judge in Madison issued a temporary
restraining order requiring the building to be kept open during business hours
and when other official business was being conducted.
The restraining order appeared to give hundreds of people the right to go
back inside the Capitol, where crowds had been denied entry by the police based
on an order issued Tuesday morning by a state agency overseen by one of Mr.
Walkerfs appointees.
Even as protesters held up copies of that order to police officers stationed
at the buildingfs entrances Tuesday afternoon, the officers said they knew
nothing about the order and refused to allow demonstrators inside.
The area around the building has been the scene of massive protests against
efforts by Mr. Walker, a Republican elected in November, to strip state employee
unions of power; facilitate the sale of state-owned power plants to investors;
cut the take-home pay of state workers; and give what public health advocates
say are expansive new powers to Mr. Walkerfs appointees to revoke some health
benefits from low-income residents.
In recent days Mr. Walkerfs administration has sought to clamp down on
protesters inside the Capitol itself. While the administration backed down over
the weekend from a plan to kick out demonstrators who had been spending the
night, the administration issued a statement Tuesday morning saying that for
every protester that left the building, only one would be allowed to enter.
In his two-week-long standoff with Democrats and state employee unions, Mr.
Walker has pressured the 14 Democratic state senators who have fled the state to
return to deal with what he says are important fiscal deadlines that would
otherwise pass this week and harm the state.
gOne day left to save the state $165 million,h said the governorfs office on
Monday, announcing the latest deadline.
If Democrats do not return by Tuesday, taxpayers would lose an option to save
that money through a grefinancing,h the governorfs office said, citing the Wisconsin
Legislative Fiscal Bureau, a nonpartisan agency that conducts budget
analysis.
But the assertion that taxpayers are on the verge of losing $165 million
appeared nowhere in the analysis of the bill.
According to that analysis, which the bureau completed two weeks ago, the
bill calls for restructuring $165 million in debt. Instead of paying the debt
off in May, it would mean new debt would be issued, deferring the repayments.
The restructuring would increase debt payments over the next two years by almost
$30 million in principal and interest.
The Tuesday deadline appeared to be based on another analysis by the bureau
that suggested that for the restructuring to happen, the state would have to
order it done at least two weeks before March 16.
But nowhere in either analysis does it suggest that taxpayers would otherwise
lose $165 million — just that the state would not be able to push back the
repayment of that amount to a later date. The debt would still be owed, and
taxpayers would still be on the hook.
To the Democrats leading the opposition in the Senate, the deadlines — and
the premise for the governorfs bill — are largely phony.
Instead, the Democrats say, the governor is trying to inflate a crisis to
make fundamental changes in the way the state works. Most of his bill has little
to do with current budget issues.
gHefs not being honest,h said State Senator Jon Erpenbach, one of the 14
Democrats.
gPiece by piece, public employees will be shown the door and then replaced by
private contractors with no accountability.h
Sabrina Tavernise reported from Columbus, Ohio, and Richard A. Oppel Jr. from
Madison, Wis. Monica Davey contributed from Madison.